JUDGEMENT
A.K.ANNAMALAI J. -
(1.) 2nd opposite party before the District Forum is the appellant.
(2.) Against this appellant and 1st opposite party filed a complaint.
Before the District Forum, the 1st respondent/complainant filed a
complaint for the claim of Rs.50,000/- towards LIC policy claim amount
against the death of her husband and Rs.10,000/- as compensation for
mental agony and Rs.1,000/- towards cost.
(3.) Since the District Forum allowed the complaint by ordering to pay
Rs.50,000/- as insurance claim amount and Rs.5,000/- as compensation and
Rs.1,000/- as cost, aggrieved by the same the appellant filed this appeal
and in this appeal it is contended by the appellant that the insured
husband of the complainant while taking policy suppressed the material
facts regarding the earlier diseases subsisted and since he died within
the period of two years from the date of policy as per the mandatory
provision under Section 45 of the Insurance Act, in view of the
investigations made by the insurance company and as the insured already
having treatment for previous diseases which were suppressed while
furnishing the details in the policy as well as before the medical
officer who examined him for providing policy the appellant insurance
company repudiated the claim of the insurance as it cannot be granted to
the complainant in view of the mandatory provision and thereby this
appeal deserves to be allowed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.