JUDGEMENT
A.K.ANNAMALAI, J. -
(1.) The unsuccessful complainants are the appellants.
(2.) The complainants filed a complaint against the opposite parties for
restoration of service connection and fit another power meter after the
receipt of minimum charges up to the date of discretion of service and
restore power supply and for Rs.10,000/- as compensation for mental agony
and for costs.
(3.) The brief details of the complaint are as follows :- The complainants
are the consumers having electricity service connection bearing SC No.299
of Ariyapalayam. The complainants have a sago factory which was defunct
for nearly 2 to 3 years due to severe drought in that area. The
complainant paid a minimum charge of Rs.2,450/- bimonthly. The
complainant came to know that the exaggerated Meter reading and abnormal
payment only on 15.10.2003 when the complainants son went to the
Puthiragoundampalayam Assistant Engineers office to receive the
minimum charge of Rs.2540/-. After having fitted FR power factor the
consumption was stated as 1495 units from 22.7.2003 to 22.9.2003 and the
complainant has been insisted by the 1st opposite party to pay Rs.6060/-
instead of Rs.2540/- as usual. The 1st opposite party has refused to
accept the minimum charges and insisted to pay Rs.6060/- so that the
complainant the first opposite party to disconnect the service connection
to avoid further exaggerated meter reading. The service connection was
disconnected on 16.10.2003 only upon the request made by the complainant.
Letter in Tamil was given to the 1st opposite party office on 15.10.2003
itself. The complainant had given another letter dated 23.10.2003
regarding the exaggerated meter reading and it was acknowledged by the
1st opposite party on 1.11.2003 and he gave an electricity Tariff fee
card on the same day. The complainant requested the 3rd opposite party by
means of a letter dated 26.10.2004 to conduct an enquiry over the
exaggerated meter reading and consider the complainants request.
Contrary to the request the first opposite party sent a reply to the
complainant on 28.8.04 stating that the complainant has to pay a sum of
Rs.34,810/- otherwise necessary action will be taken. The opposite party
justifies the meter reading of 1500 units for 61 days and 3516 units for
a period of 26 days only. The complainant sent another request to the 3rd
opposite party to conduct an enquiry on 23.9.2004 by way of registered
post and a copy sent to the 1st opposite party so far the complainants
requests were not responded by them. The said act on the part of the
opposite parties have caused a great mental agony and anguish to the
complainant.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.