JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) Opposite parties are the appellants.
(2.) The respondent, in this appeal as complainant, approached the District
Forum, claiming a sum of Rs.15 lakhs, against the opposite parties,
towards damages and compensation, alleging negligent and improper
treatment, on the following grounds (in brief).
(3.) The complainant being a smoker, suddenly stopped that habit, on the
advise of his family doctor Dr. Devrajan, which resulted development of
mild giddiness, restlessness and sleeplessness, for which, as advised by
the family doctor, he approached the 1st opposite party, a leading Neuro
Psychiatrist, for treatment on 25.8.2003, at about 11.00 a.m. The 1st
opposite party advised the complainant to take out a brain mapping scan,
from the 2nd opposite party, and accordingly, paying a total sum of
Rs.800/-, EEG brain mapping was taken, which was handed over to the 1st
opposite party. On the basis of the EEG done, even without examining the
complainant, the 1st opposite party prescribed certain tablets for 30
days, advising to come for review, on 24.9.2003, further advising to take
the pills, without any break, handing over EEG mapping also.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.