JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) The 1st opposite party, by filing this appeal, challenges the order of
the district Forum dt.4.5.2010, wherein a direction has been given
against them, to pay a sum of Rs.64,690.80/-, with compensation of
Rs.5000/-, alongwith cost.
(2.) The 1st respondent/ complainant, had booked a package tour to visit
Darjeeling, for which he took air tickets, and hotel accommodation,
through the 2nd opposite party. As per the tour programme, he had
obtained E-tickets, from the 2nd opposite party, on behalf of the 1st
opposite party, to fly from Chennai Airport to Calcutta, on 17.5.2008,
and from Calcutta to Baghdogra, by Jet airways, on the same day. As
scheduled, the complainant and his family members reached the Airport,
Chennai, they were issued boarding passes also, but it was informed that
the flight will take delayed, and finally taken off from Chennai at 10.00
a.m, arriving Calcutta by 12.15 p.m, by that time, Jet Airways, left from
Calcutta, depriving the journey, on the same day, to reach the place of
accommodation. At Calcutta, when the complainant requested for
alternative arrangement, the 1st opposite party, demanded ticket fare,
and collected Rs.19,690.80/-, thereby they have committed negligence, and
deficiency in service, by delaying the flight, then collecting the fare
from Calcutta to Baghdogra, which the complainant is entitled to refund.
Because of the delayed departure, and other inconvenience, the
complainant suffered mental agony, with his family members, for which he
is entitled to a sum of Rs.3 lakhs, as compensation, not only under this
ground, but also on the ground of unfair trade practice. Hence the
complaint.
(3.) The 1st opposite party , admitting the ticket booked by the
complainant, for the flight No.DN 675, which was scheduled to depart from
Chennai at 5.25 am on 17.5.2008 to Calcutta, resisted the case, interalia
contending that before take off, when the routine checkup was conducted,
they have noticed that the aircraft developed some technical problem,
causing delay, for which, they cannot be held responsible, that from
Calcutta to Baghdogra, originally the complainant had not purchased any
ticket in their airways, and therefore when the complainant had sought to
travel from Calcutta to Baghdogra, they have charged as per the flight
charge, cannot be faulted, that even as per the terms and conditions
available in the ticket, the 1st opposite party is not entitled to any
damage, thereby praying for the dismissal of the complaint.;