JUDGEMENT
A.K.ANNAMALAI, J. -
(1.) The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant.
(2.) Complainant pledged his jewels with the opposite party bank and
availed jewel loan of Rs.39,000/- on 5.2.2003. Opposite party sent a
notice dated 8.3.06 by courier on 22.3.06 which was delivered to one
Kumaresan of the opposite house of the complainant on 25.3.06. When the
complainant approached the bank on 27.3.06 he was informed that the
pledged jewels were already sold in auction on 25.3.06 to one Sathya.
Hence a legal notice was sent on 3.4.06. But no reply was received from
the opposite party and thereby the complainant filed this complaint
claiming a sum of Rs.1,15,000/- towards costs of the jewel and to deduct
a sum of Rs.40,300/- with interest towards loan up to 25.3.06 and another
Rs.1,00,000/- each for deficiency of service and for mental agony as
compensation and Rs.5,000/- as costs.
(3.) The opposite party denied the allegations and stated that the jewels
were auctioned in public after due notice since the complainant was a
chronic defaulter in repayment of the loan and there was no deficiency of
service.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.