JUDGEMENT
A.K.ANNAMALAI, J -
(1.) The 1st opposite party is the appellant.
(2.) The complainant filed a complaint against the opposite parties 1 & 2
claiming for payment of Rs.1,00,000/- towards the insured amount for the
accident benefit for complainants deceased husband and directing the
opposite parties to pay the balance amount of Rs.2,51,000/- lying with
the current account No.ICD 719 to the complainant and directing the
opposite parties to pay Rs.50,000/- towards deficiency of service and
mental agony and with costs.
(3.) The complainant in his complaint as stated in brief are as follows:-
The complainants husband was having a current account with the 1st
opposite party with an insurance coverage for the accident benefit of
Rs.1,00,000/- on 4.3.1996 and appointed the complainant as his nominee.
On 5.2.2002 the complainants husband died as in a traffic accident
under the Sulur Police Station limit and a criminal case under Sec.279 &
304(A) of IPC in FIR No.73/2002 was registered. The complainant claimed
the insurance amount from the 1st opposite party by sending a letter on
24.4.02 by post and as there was no reply on 3.6.02 a registered post was
sent and subsequently on 5.8.02, 8.2.02, 12.10.02 also the complainant
sent reminder letters and only on 9.12.02 after the lapse of 8 months
from the date of intimation by the complainant the 1st opposite party
sent a letter stating that the claim preferred by the complainant was not
considered favourably owning to the delayed information sent by the
complainant. On 26.12.02 the Tiruppur Consumer Voice also sent a
registered letter to the 1st opposite party to settle the claim of the
complainant. On 10.1.2003 a reply was sent by rejecting the claim. The
complainant states the 1st opposite party refused to give scheme of
details of the ICD account of the husband of the complainant and refused
to disclose of the name and address of the insurance company. As per the
pass book the complainant husband was having a sum of Rs.2,51,000/- as
balance and entitled to withdraw the same. The 2nd opposite party is the
insurer and both opposite parties in concert each other by deliberately
not informing the insurance details of the deceased to the complainant
with a view to defeating in pending claim of the complainant. Hence the
complainant come forward with this complaint seeking the relief against
the opposite parties as prayed for.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.