JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM J. -
(1.) The 1st opposite party is the appellant.
(2.) Facts leading to this appeal:
The minor complainant, aged about 12 years, was suffering from nasal
block, for which he was admitted in the 1st opposite party hospital on
31.10.2003, where he was examined and operated by the 2nd opposite party,
on 1.11.2003, after administering anesthesia. The complainant while taken
to the operation theatre, had no injury of any kind, including burns on
his body. After surgery, when he was brought back to the post-operative
ward, the mother noticed a burn injury on his left leg, on the back of
the knee, which was informed immediately, for which the opposite parties
have not given any direct reply, how the complainant had sustained burn
injury, whereas they were giving evasive reply. Within 2 or 3 days of the
postoperative period, the injury due to burn, became so severe, and
acute, the complainant had completely lost the sensitiveness in his left
leg, leading paralysis for which the opposite party should be held
responsible, since they have committed negligent act, by their supine
indifference, carelessness, causing mental agony to the complainant.
(3.) The condition of the complainant became worse day by day, and there
was no improvement, and therefore he was discharged from the 1st opposite
party on 6.11.2003, and admitted as inpatient on 7.11.2003 in National
Hospital, Chennai, where the injury was investigated, diagnosed as "Post
Burn Eschar Left Lateral aspect of Popliteral Fossa with left Peroneal
Nerve Palsy", for which surgery was undertaken including Escherectomy and
Flap Transposition and Skin Grafting on 17.11.2003. The complainant was
discharged from the National Hospital, with direction to come as
Domictllary for Galvanic Nerve Stimulation. The complainant was also
advised that Tendon Transfer Surgery has to be performed at a later date
if there is total irreversible permanent foot drop due to non viability
of the damaged nerve. Thus by the negligent act of the opposite parties ,
the complainant was compelled to take treatment for 31/2 months, and even
after the treatment, the left leg of the complainant was practically
became unusable and the complainant limb, even to walk, requiring further
surgery to improve his position. Therefore, the complainant is entitled
to compensation for pain and sufferings Rs.2 lakhs, as compensation for
permanent disability if any Rs.5,25,000/-, compensation for the loss of
earning power Rs.2 lakhs, including a medical expenses of Rs.75000/-,
totaling a sum of Rs.10 lakhs, claiming the above said compensation,
though notice issued, there was no compliance, thereby the complainant
was compelled to file the consumer complaint, for the relief.;