JUDGEMENT
TMT.VASUGI RAMANAN J. -
(1.) Complainants are the appellants.
(2.) The case of the complainants is as follows :- The complainant applied
for a housing loan of Rs.1,50,000/- on 17.9.2007. The complainant alleged
that the 1st opposite party took an amount of Rs.1,324/- towards
membership for obtaining loan. The 1st opposite party after receiving all
the documents refused to sanction the loan and the same was informed
after 8 months. The complainant issued legal notice, to which the
opposite parties sent a false reply. The complainant borrowed money for
higher rate of interest in the hope of obtaining loan from opposite
party. Since the opposite party has not sanctioned loan, complainant
filed a complaint with the above prayer.
(3.) The averments of the 1st opposite party is as follows :- The 1st
opposite party alleged that the legal opinion regarding sanction of loan
was available on 27.12.2007. But the complainant filed a sale deed
executed and registered on 22.1.2007. The opposite party based on the
documents after obtaining legal opinion, refused to sanction loan on the
grounds that the complainant does not have proper title in the property.
The opposite party informed the same to the complainant and returned the
documents to him. The opposite party denied any deficiency in service.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.