JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant.
(2.) The complainant in order to purchase two plots, in Survey No.62, in
Palanichettypatti village, applied for encumbrance for 17 years, which
was given on 27.11.2007, denoting the title of the vendor to the
complainant. On that basis, the complainant purchased the property viz.
Plot No.24, 25, under a registered sale deed dt.11.2.2007, for a
consideration of Rs.2,13,750/-. When the complainant intended to demark
her property, by producing sale deed, one Churchil claimed to have
purchased plot No.25, from his vendors Selvaraj and Chandra. In order to
verify, the complainant applied encumbrance certificate, with the 2nd
respondent, which revealed the sale of the year 1989. If the prior
encumbrance certificate had disclosed the encumbrance, the complainant
would not have purchased the property and because of the EC issued by the
2nd opposite party, on 27.11.2007, the complainant had purchased the
property, totally spending a sum of Rs.2,32,700/-. Because of the
encumbrance the complainant was put to mental agony, for which the
opposite parties are liable to pay a sum of Rs.2 lakhs, and for
deficiency in service, another Rs.2 lakhs. Though the complainant is
entitled to a sum of Rs.6,32,900/- she restricts her claim leniently at
Rs.5 lakhs. Thus claiming, a consumer complaint was filed.
(3.) The 2nd opposite party questioning the jurisdiction of the consumer
forum, to maintain the case, further resisted the complaint, contending
that because of the improper description of the property, while applying
encumbrance certificate, the mistake would have been occurred, that
cannot be taken as deficiency in service, that none of the encumbrance
certificates relied on by the complainant was obtained by the
complainant, by paying any amount, and therefore she is not entitled to
maintain the case as a consumer, that even as per the rules framed under
Registration Act, immunity is given to the staff, and in this view also,
the complaint is not maintainable, thereby praying for the dismissal of
the complaint.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.