JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) The complainant is the appellant.
(2.) The complainant, who is having bank account, with the 1st opposite
party bank, had issued a cheque for Rs.3507/-, towards premium for his
three policies, taken with 2nd opposite party, to the 3rd opposite party,
who was the agent. The 3rd opposite party, interpolated and altered the
cheque, converted the figure of Rs.3507/- as Rs.33507/-, thereby
withdrawn the said amount, which cheque was passed negligently by the 1st
opposite party, despite there was material alteration, thereby they have
committed negligent act, as well as deficiency in service. Despite a
police complaint was given, notice was issued, no fruitful result
achieved, thereby compelling the complainant to come to the consumer
forum, claiming cheque amount, as well as compensation, for the
deficiency committed by the opposite parties. Hence the complaint.
(3.) The 1st opposite party alone contested the case, by filing written
version, contending that following the due procedure, they have passed
the cheque dt.1.7.2005, issued by the complainant, in favour of the 3rd
opposite party, in which they have not committed any negligent act, or
deficiency in service, and this being the position, they are not
answerable to the claim of the complainant, thereby praying for the
dismissal of the complaint.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.