JUDGEMENT
A.K.ANNAMALAI, J. -
(1.) Opposite party is the appellant.
(2.) Complainant filed a complaint against the opposite party claiming
direction for payment of Rs.1,50,000/- towards medical expenses and
Rs.7,50,000/- towards compensation for mental agony and discomfort and
Rs.2,000/- as costs for the wrongful treatment given by the opposite
party.
(3.) Complainant was admitted in opposite party?s hospital on 3.5.2000 for
the treatment of non union fracture right tibia and the operation was
conducted after payment of Rs.50,000/- and discharged on 15.5.2000 within
a few days since the complainant had pain on the right leg because of the
low standard plate fixed by the opposite party and after informing the
broken plate found opposite party performed another operation to remove
the same on 14.11.2000. He was discharged on 17.11.2000, since the pain
continued on 4.12.2002, once again joined with the opposite party
hospital for further treatment for removal of cancellous and an operation
of cancellous bone grafting and spent more than Rs.80,000/- towards
medical expenses and since no improvement was made he had treatment at
Jipmer Hospital. There the other left out portions of the broken plate
was removed and thereby for the negligence of the opposite party
complainant filed this consumer complaint.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.