JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) This appeal is targeted against the order of the District Forum, in
CC.No.71/2006, on the file of District Forum, Dindigul, wherein a
direction has been issued to pay compensation, affixing deficiency in
service, upon the 2nd opposite party/ appellant.
(2.) Factual matrix:
The complainant had purchased an Indica Car, bearing Regn. No.TN 57 X
5533, which was insured with the 2nd opposite party, by the 1st opposite
party, for the period from 5.7.2005 to 4.7.2006, for which necessary
endorsement was made in the RC book, on 10.2.2006.
(3.) On 26.2.2006, when the complainant and his family members were
travelling in the car, with an accident, causing injury to the inmates,
including the complainant?s wife, for which a case has been registered
under Sec.279 & 337 IPC. Though steps were being taken, for transfer of
the insurance certificate, that was effected only on 2.3.2006, showing on
the date of accident, the policy was in force. Based upon the policy, the
complainant lodged a claim, after spending considerable amount viz.
Rs.90,580/-, which was repudiated on false grounds, for which the
complainant is entitled to a sum of Rs.5000/-, under the heading
deficiency in service. Thus a consumer complaint was filed, for the
recovery of a sum of Rs.1,05,080/-.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.