JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) The opposite parties 1 & 4 are the appellants.
(2.) Facts leading to the case:
The complainant/1st respondent, dealing with fancy cloth items, had sold
the towel items, under two invoices to one Rajeswar Prasad Seth, having
his business concern at Chanda Post, Araria District, Bihar, for a total
sum of Rs.22,400/-. The invoices, and hundis were sent for collection,
through 1st opposite party bank, who is competent to send the same to
their counter part at Chanda, who in turn will collect the amount, and
deliver the bill, on which basis the purchaser is entitled to take
delivery of the goods, sent through the 2nd opposite party. Despite the
lapse of more than 30 days, amount was not collected by the 1st opposite
party, and reminder by the complainant also failed to yield any positive
result. Thus by the negligence committed by the opposite parties 1 and 2,
the complainant was put to monetary loss of Rs.22400/-, in addition
causing mental agony, for which the complainant is entitled to
compensation of Rs.35000/-. Thus claiming originally, the consumer
complaint was filed, against opposite parties 1 and 2.
(3.) After objections raised by the opposite parties, regarding non-joinder
of parties 3 and 4, were impleaded as per order in CMP.No.131/2003
dt.25.6.2003.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.