JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) The opposite parties are the appellants.
(2.) The complainant/ respondent, who is doing cement business at various
places in Salem city, had applied service connection for one such
business, at 9/40 Parasakthi Nagar, Trichy Main Road, for which, as
directed by the opposite parties, the complainant also deposited amount
on 6.9.2006. Thereafter, the 1st opposite party effected service
connection, then immediately as per the direction given by the 3rd
opposite party, disconnected the service connection, on the same day. 1st
Opposite party also issued a notice, as if the neighbours by name
Nagarajan and his wife have opposed the service connection.
(3.) The opposite Parties, having received the deposit amount, and other
requisite fee from the complainant, ought to have effected the service
connection, and their failure to do so, affected his business, warranting
a daily loss of RS.500/- to Rs.1000/-, which is to be reimbursed by the
opposite party. For the deficiency committed, claiming compensation,
notice was issued, for which there was no reply. Hence, the complainant
is constrained to file a consumer complaint, seeking direction to effect
electricity service connection, as well for the recovery of a sum of
Rs.2,38,500/-, loss incurred by the complainant, due to non-effecting of
electricity service connection, with cost.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.