JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) The opposite parties are the appellants.
(2.) The challenge in this appeal is the order dt.11.8.2009, wherein a
direction was issued by the District Forum against the opposite parties
to pay a sum of Rs.71,280/-, being the value of lost baggage, and a sum
of Rs.15000/- as compensation.
(3.) The respondent/ complainant returned from Bangkok, after his business
tour, via Colombo to Trichy on 23.9.2005, in the flight operated by
Airlankan flights. In Bangkok, the complainant entrusted 5 bags, that are
duty free excess baggage, for safe custody, paying a charge of
Rs.14000/-, for the excess weight of 100 Kgs. In the 5 baggage, that were
entrusted to the opposite parties, two baggages were missing, which
contained 138 cartoons of Benzen and Hedges cigarettes. The matter was
reported to Airlankan authorities at Trichy, who issued a missing baggage
receipt also. The opposite party officials informed that two missing bags
were lying at customs authorities at Srilanka, informing further that the
custom authorities had detained these two baggages. For retrieving the
mishandled baggage no action was taken till now, which is a clear and
sheer negligence and deficiency in service. When this was reported, the
opposite party offered, to pay 800 USD, which was not accepted by the
complainant, since it is not an accident, whereas its mishandling of the
baggage not properly tagging to track the luggage, which is the usual
practice in any airlines. Thus by the conduct of the opposite parties,
not serving properly, the complainant was put to mental agony, monetary
loss, including other expenses for going to Srilanka. Thus the
complainant is entitled to total a sum of Rs.1,71,208/-. Hence the
complaint.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.