JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM J. -
(1.) The complainant, challenges the order of the District Forum, in CC
No.2/2007, on the file of District Forum, Coimbatore dt.29.4.2008, since
her claim was not accepted, by the District Forum.
(2.) The opposite party offered to allot a shop in Salivan Street,
Coimbatore, on license, upon application by the complainant, and
accordingly, allotted a shop bearing No.1, on 12.6.2003, fixing the
license fee of Rs.9000/- per month, but the complainant has not been
handed over possession, even after allotment, as well as payment, despite
the further fact one year license fee, as requested by the opposite
party, was paid, calling upon the opposite party to handover the key of
the shop. When a claim was made, by way of reminder, it was incorrectly
informed, as if possession was handed over. The opposite party, breaking
open the lock, allowing the complainant to lay the tiles, for interior
decoration, then locked, refusing possession, which should be construed
as unfair trade practice, as well as negligent act, which had caused
mental agony, hence the complainant is entitled to the refund of a sum of
Rs.1,43,000/-, alongwith interest, in addition to the expenses incurred
for laying the tiles, alongwith compensation of Rs.50000/-. Hence the
complaint.
(3.) The opposite party, admitting the auction conducted by them, in which
a shop was allotted to the complainant, as well payment of caution
deposit, including payment of one year license fee, resisted the case,
contending that as per the conditions available in the allotment order,
the allottee/ complainant, has to take possession, within 7 days, failing
which it shall be construed, that the allottee had taken possession of
the property, that even as per the averments in the complaint, possession
was given, thereby enabling the complainant to lay tiles, as interior
decoration, that after taking possession, in order to avoid payment of
the license fee, the complainant pleads as if possession was not handed
over, which is endorsed by the engineer also, that the complaint itself
is not maintainable, thereby praying for the dismissal of the complaint.;