JUDGEMENT
A.K.ANNAMALAI, J. -
(1.) Opposite parties are the appellants.
(2.) Complainant filed a complaint against the opposite parties claiming
refund of Rs.375/- paid as parking charges and Rs.50,000/- as
compensation for mental agony and loss and for deficiency of service for
the unfair trade practice and for costs.
(3.) Complainant on 31.3.08 went to the opposite parties? restaurant and
parked his motorcycle bearing Registration No.TN 74 U-9522 in the vacant
space of the opposite parties? hotel and had his breakfast. Since there
was rain he was not able to take out the motorcycle immediately enquired
with the 2nd opposite party for parking his motorcycle in the hotel
compound for some time and will take after his return. 2nd opposite party
did not inform anything about the parking charges at about 11 pm on the
same day not when complainant went and taken the motorcycle where it was
left. The 2nd opposite party insisted for the payment of Rs.375/- as
parking charges and it was paid under protest and obtained the receipt
for the same. In the receipt it is found it is only meant for parking
charges for the car and not for bike. When enquired 2nd opposite party
gave evasive reply and receiving the parking charges in a wrongful and
deceitful manner is an unfair trade practice. The vehicle was made to be
left in under rain and sun in the vacant place no parking facilities
provided. No separate roof was found. Hence after giving legal notice on
25.4.08 a reply was given with false allegations on 3.6.08. Hence the
complainant comes forward with this consumer complaint.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.