JUDGEMENT
A.K.ANNAMALAI J. -
(1.) The 1st Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District
Forum, Tirchirappalli, alleging deficiency against the opposite parties
to refund the Agricultural E.B.connection charges of Rs.375/- together
with an interest from 29.1.04 to the date of Repayment, to pay a
compensation to the tune of Rs.50,000/- for having caused acute mental
agony, inconvenience, etc., and to pay Rs.2,000/- towards costs. The
District Forum, allowed the complaint against the 1st opposite party.
Against the said order, this appeal is preferred by the 1st opposite
party, praying to set aside the order of the District Forum,
Trichirappalli, dated 5.9.08 in O.P.No.139/2006.
This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 27.04.2011, upon
hearing the arguments of the counsel on complainant side, and perused the
documents, written submissions as well as the order of the District
Forum, this Commission made the following order :-
The 1st opposite party is the appellant.
(2.) The complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum, against
the opposite parties claiming for the refund of Rs.375/- with interest
for the deficiency of service and for Rs.50,000/- as compensation for
mental agony and Rs.2,000/- as costs.
(3.) The details of the complaint in brief are as follows :- The
complainant has 0.53 Acre of land at Mumudi Solamangalam Village at
Lalgudi Taluk with Agricultural Electricity connection in the name of
complainants mother Arbutha Mery from the year 1964 and entitled for
the grant of Government free service with other land including for the
total extent of 1.60 acre lands. But in the 1st opposite partys
records it was wrongly recorded as having 2.60 acres. Earlier the
Government was collecting charges from small farmers like the petitioner
for electricity and subsequently it was revoked by the Government.
Accordingly on 1.4.2003 the 1st opposite party collected Rs.375/- towards
EB connection charge and the same was refunded to all the farmers by
money order through the 2nd opposite party, but the complainant was not
refunded. When approached the opposite party he was directed to get
certificate from the village officials regarding the extent of land and
meanwhile petitioner sought for name transfer from his mothers name to
his name and was directed to pay Rs.375/- for the charges and he has paid
the same and submitted all the documents on 29.1.04. But in spite of the
same even though he was assured for the refund nothing was materialized.
He has filed complaint seeking for the relief of refund of agricultural
connection charges of Rs.375/- with interest and compensation for
Rs.50,000/- and for Rs.2,000/- as costs.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.