JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) The opposite party is the appellant.
(2.) The respondent/ complainant, approached the District Forum, seeking
direction for the refund of a sum of RS.20000/-, paid by him in two Chit
groups, as well as for compensation of Rs.10000/-, for mental agony,
alleging that the opposite party having collected the amounts, failed to
inform the commencement of the chit, as well as failed to demand and
inform, the amount payable then and there, which should be construed as
deficiency, that inspite of repeated request, they have also failed to
refund the amount collected, that should be construed as deficiency.
(3.) The opposite party admitting that the complainant was a subscriber in
two Group as well the payment of Rs.10000/- each, resisted the case
contending that despite repeated request, the complainant failed to pay
the subsequent payment, viz. subscriptions, that as per the Tamil Nadu
Chit Funds Act, the foremen is entitled to 5% commission, and the sum was
adjusted from the payment made by the complainant, that because of the
default committed by the complainant, the entire period of chit runs
without alternative subscriber, thereby causing loss to the chit company,
that the opposite party has not committed any deficiency in service, then
there is no question of refund the amount, or paying any compensation,
thus praying for the dismissal of the complaint.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.