JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) This appeal, is targeted against the order of the District Forum, in
OP.No.218/2005, on the file of District Forum, Chennai (North), wherein a
direction has been issued, against the opposite parties, to pay a sum of
Rs.25000/-, as compensation, based upon negligent act.
(2.) The complainant/ respondent, in this appeal, had taken his child for
treatment to Dr.D. Ganesan on 16.6.2005, who prescribed a medicine, which
was purchased by the complainant from the opposite party, on the same
day, for consideration. After administration of the medicine, as directed
by the doctor, the child became dull and unconscious, rushing the baby to
the doctor once again, with the medicine purchased. On seeing the
medicine, the doctor informed, that the opposite party had supplied
instead of Pyrigesic syrup, Pyrigesic drops, which is more concentrated,
and the administration of the said drops alone, caused problem to the
child. The act of the opposite party, in supplying wrong medicine should
be construed as negligent act, which caused mental agony, and other
problems, for which the complainant is entitled to a compensation of
Rs.35000/-, alongwith cost of Rs.5000/-, for which a consumer complaint
came to be filed.
(3.) The opposite party, admitting the purchase of the medicine by the
complainant, resisted the claim, contending that as per the prescription,
he sold the medicine, for which they cannot be found fault, and if at all
the doctor is to be held responsible thereby praying for the dismissal of
the complaint.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.