JUDGEMENT
A.K.ANNAMALAI J. -
(1.) The Respondent as complainant filed a complaint before the District
Forum, Pudukkottai, alleging deficiency against the opposite parties to
pay the maturity value of the 13 Kisan Vikas Patra bearing Nos.48CC
181992 to 181999 dated 21.9.98 at the matured value of Rs.2,60,000/-, to
pay at least 12% interest as damages on the maturity value from the date
on which it mature till realization, to pay Rs.70,000/- towards mental
agony and costs. The District Forum, allowed the complaint against the
opposite parties. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred by the
opposite parties, praying to set aside the order of the District Forum,
Pudukkottai, dated 30.06.08 in C.C.No.20/2006.
This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 15.04.2011, upon
hearing the arguments of the counsel on both sides and perused the
documents, written submissions as well as the order of the District
Forum, this Commission made the following order :-
The opposite parties are the appellants.
(2.) The respondent/complainant filed a complaint against opposite parties
for the direction of to pay the maturity value of the 13 Kisan Vikas
Patra of Rs.2,60,000/-, to pay at least 12% interest as damages on the
maturity value from the date on which it mature till realization, to pay
Rs.70,000/- towards mental agony and for the cost.
(3.) The details of the complaint in brief are as follows :- The
complainant is the Co-operative Society with main functions of
Agricultural members welfare by selling their products for the good price
and to improve their status in the society under the control of State
Co-operative Department and thereby the amount collected from the members
at the beginning of 1998 of Rs.1,30,000/- in order to get profitable
income from the same the amount was deposited with the 1st opposite party
under Kisan Vikas Patras and thereby 8 deposits were made on 7.3.98 and
two deposits were made on 30.3.99 which are payable after the maturity
period of 5 years and other 3 deposits 11 to 13 are payable after 6
years and each deposit is having face value of Rs.10,000/- and thereby
this would become double the amount on maturity and a total sum of
Rs.1,30,000/- was paid for the same. When the complainant asked for the
payment of 8 deposits right for maturity on 7.9.03 after the date the 1st
opposite party not complied the same and after that letters were sent on
30.12.03 and 23.2.04 for which the 1st opposite party sent a reply on
19.4.04 by stating that those deposits were wrongly received against the
rules and asked for the option to receive the amount with the savings
bank interest rate and thereby the 1st opposite party had acted in the
fraudulent manner and by keeping the deposit for 5 years to 6 years
and after demanding the amount made a request for collecting the amount
with the Savings Bank rate of interest is would amount to deficiency of
service and thereby the complainants sent necessary letters to the 2nd
opposite party and the 2nd opposite party sent reply by stating that the
matter was under consideration and there was no response subsequently.
Even after filing petition before the District Legal Services Authorities
and failed to appear there also and thereby a legal notice was sent on
24.10.05 for which after 3 months, the 1st opposite party sent a reply
that those deposits were wrongly received against the rules for which no
interest could be paid and thereby the complainant sustained loss to the
members of the society and they have to be compensated and hence the
complaint was filed for the relief as prayed for.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.