JUDGEMENT
M.THANIKACHALAM, J. -
(1.) The Revision Petitioners as complainant, leveling medical negligence
against opposite parties 1 to 6, claiming compensation, have filed
CC.No.131/2001, on the file of District Forum, Salem. At the fake end of
the trial probably, the complainants wanted to produce, and mark certain
documents, to prove the conduct of the opposite parties 5 & 6, as if
their names have been removed from the role of Medical Council of India,
from practicing for a period of 6 months, probably that period might have
been over. When those documents are sought to be filed, marked as
documents, on the side of the complainant, it was objected, accepted,
resulting dismissal of CMP.109/2010, and the said order is under
challenge in this revision.
(2.) As submitted before us, the documents sought to be exhibited, are
produced only to prove some negligence, said to have been committed by R5
& R6, in some other case, or some proceedings initiated against R5 and
R6, whether it is with reference to the medical profession or not, unless
that documents are received, we cannot find out, what is the role, played
by the opposite parties 5 & 6, and whether those documents, will have any
relevance to decide the alleged medical negligence in CC.No.313/2001. It
is also represented, that there is some contra, documents are available,
indicating, the proceedings were dropped by the Tamil Nadu Medical
Council, if that is so, it is for the opposite parties 5 & 6 to file the
same, and if possible to nullify the documents, relied on by the
complainants. In this view, we are inclined to give an opportunity to
both the parties. Therefore, it may not be proper on the part of the
District Forum, to deny the rights of the parties in the initial stage
itself, without giving an opportunity to produce the documents, thereby
avoiding unnecessary comment, as if opportunity was not given. Hence
revision deserves acceptance.
(3.) In the result, the Revision Petition is allowed, setting aside the
order of the District Forum in CMP.No.109/2010, dt.15.09.2010, and the
petition is allowed. The District Forum is directed to receive the
documents. If opposite parties 5 & 6 are having any documents, liberty is
also given to them, to file their documents and agitate their rights.
With these observations, the Revision is disposed.;