JUDGEMENT
M. THANIKACHALAM J. -
(1.) The 5th opposite party is the appellant.
(2.) The 1st respondent, in this appeal, as complainant, has filed a case
against five opposite parties, including this appellant, for the recovery
of a sum of Rs.70000/-, alleging that the deposit made by him with the
opposite parties 1 and 2, not returned even after deducting the loan
amount, borrowed by him, despite repeated demand, and notice, thereby
accusing deficiency.
(3.) The opposite parties 1 and 2, appears to have remained exparte,
opposite parties 3 and 4 contested the case independently.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.