JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby and whereunder the petitioner being aggrieved with the action of the
respondent no.5 who is making an alteration in the building without resorting
to any provision as provided under Jharkhand Municipal Act, 2011, has
assailed the same.
(2.) It is the grievance of the petitioner as has been agitated in the writ petition that he is tenant of erstwhile owner of the building which has been
sold out in favour of the respondentno.5, who has pasted a notice in the
building showing therein about the condition of building which according to
the respondent no.5 is not inhabitable.
(3.) It is the further grievance of the petitioner as has been stated in the interlocutory application being I.A. No.9769 of 2019 by annexing
photograph that the respondent no.5 has also started demolishing the
building and therefore, the petitioner is compelled to live in open sky which
according to the petitioner is highly illegal and improper since even if
accepting the fact that the condition of building is not inhabitable, the
subsequent purchaser, respondent no.5, ought to have approached the
Municipal Authority, wherein under Section 387 of the Jharkhand Municipal
Act, 2011 provision has been made to deal with such situation.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.