JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This writ petition is under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, whereby and whereunder direction has been sought for upon the respondents
to forthwith refund the amount of Earnest Money Deposit as a condition for
participating in bid for allotment of Retail Excise Shop in terms of the
gazette notification dated 25.12.2018 and in terms of the sale notification as
contained in Annexure-2 and Annexure-3 notice issued by the Excise
Department dated 22.02.2019 whereby and whereunder, specific condition
has been stipulated for refund of earnest money in case the bidder will be
found unsuccessful in the bid.
(2.) It is the case of the petitioner that in terms of the notice inviting bid, participation has been made for consideration of its candidature for
settlement of liquor shop. The petitioner has submitted the application form
by submitting all the relevant documents as also the earnest money deposit
as required. The committee has considered the candidature of the petitioner
but the candidature of the petitioner has been rejected declaring as
unsuccessful applicant. The petitioner thereafter has made an application for
refund of earnest money in view of the condition stipulated under Chapter-
IV Clause 23 Sub Clause-II of the notification dated 25.12.2018, which is
Jharkhand Excise Rule pertaining to Settlement and Management of Shops
for retail outlet of liquor but no decision has been taken. The grievance of
the petitioner is that when the petitioner has been declared unsuccessful in
view of the condition stipulated under Rule 2018 as also the notice inviting
bid under Annexure-2 and notice as Annexure-3 to the writ petition, the
earnest money deposited by the petitioner is to be refunded back without any
rhyme and reason as per the rules and as per condition stipulated in the
notice inviting bid, therefore the instant writ petition.
(3.) Learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State of Jharkhand has submitted that since the rule itself provides for refund back the earnest
money deposit in case the applicant is declared to be unsuccessful and since
the petitioner has already made representation before the authority for
claiming the said amount, therefore the writ petition may be disposed of at
this stage.
Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into
consideration the provision as provided under Rule 2018 which provides a
condition with respect to the action to be taken by the authority regarding
earnest money deposit in case of unsuccessful application it is to be refunded
back as early as possible after the closure of the settlement process but so far
as it relates to successful applicant the earnest money deposit shall be
adjusted against the amount of security deposit.
The notice inviting application has been issued as under Annexure-2
likewise a further notice has been issued under Annexure-3 stipulating the
said condition under Chapter-IV Clause 23 Sub Clause-II of the Rule 2018.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.