JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard Mr. Rajiv Kumar Karn, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants.
(2.) This appeal has been filed for the following relief:
"In the instant appeal appellants prays for setting aside the order dated 22.08.2019 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge - VII - cum - Special Judge SC/ST., Dhanbad in Anticipatory Bail Petition No.1651/2019 whereby and whereunder the learned Additional Sessions Judge - VII - cum - Special Judge SC/ST., Dhanbad rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants in connection with Dhanbad SC/ST P.S. Case No.05/2019 in connection with SC/ST Case No.55/2019 which was registered U/s 341/323/325/354/34 IPC and Section 3(x) of the SC/ST Act which is pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge - VII - cum - Special Judge SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, Dhanbad."
(3.) Counsel for the appellants submits by referring to the F.I.R that the appellants are quite innocent and they have not
committed any offence and the case itself has been lodged on
account of the fact that the husband of the informant and the
family members were involved in certain illegal transportation
of P.D.S rice and on the basis of information given by the
appellants, the bags of rice were seized and a criminal case was
also lodged. He further submits that during the pendency of the
case, good feelings and harmonious relationship between the
appellants and the opposite party no.2 has prevailed and they
are at good terms with each other accordingly, he further
submits that considering this aspect of the matter, the
appellants may be enlarged on anticipatory bail and the
impugned order may be set aside.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.