JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Both the appeals are heard together as they arise from the same complaint case. The appellants have faced the trial
in S.T. No. 106/2014 before the Court of Sri Shiv Pal Singh,
learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Godda, who under
judgment dated 04.04.2019 has held the appellants guilty
under Section 304 (B) of I.P.C. and further under order dated
09.04.2019 awarded sentence to undergo R.I. for seven years. The Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 435/2019 was filed on
24.04.2019 and on 16.05.2019, the appeal was admitted for hearing and L.C.R. was called for and learned Rakesh Kumar
Sinha accepts the notice on behalf of the State.
The Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 436/2019 was filed on
24.04.2019 and on 16.05.2019, the appeal was admitted for hearing and L.C.R. was called for and learned Vipul Divya
accepts the notice on behalf of the State.
(2.) It appears that under order dated 09.07.2019, the LCR was received, but it was xerox copy of the original L.C.R., so
original L.C.R. was called for.
Now the original L.C.R. has been received.
I.A. No. 4081 of 2019 and I.A. No. 4080 of 2019 filed
under Section 389(1) of the Cr.P.C. on behalf of the appellants
for suspension of sentence and for admitting the appellants on
bail has been pressed.
As per evidence of P.W.-9, who is mother of the deceased,
that her daughter was married to Mithilesh Bhandari @
Mithlesh Bhandari (appellant in Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 435/2019)
and she was blessed with one son. Further, Suchan Bhandari @
Subhand Bhandari (appellant in Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 436/2019)
is the father-in-law of the deceased.
(3.) Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that neither the post-mortem report has been proved nor the doctor
has been examined in this case, so the reason of death cannot
be ascertained.
Learned APPs opposed the prayer for bail of the
appellants.
After hearing the parties and taking into account the fact
that the doctor has not been examined, I am inclined to admit
the appellant namely, Suchan Bhandari @ Subhand
Bhandari (appellant in Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 436/2019) on
bail after suspending the order of sentence during pendency
of the appeal and he is directed to be released on bail on
furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five
thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Godda, in
connection with S.T. No. 106 of 2014 (arising out of P.C.R. Case
No. 574/2010).
I.A. No. 4080 / 2019 stands allowed.
So far prayer for bail of Mithilesh Bhandari @ Mithlesh
Bhandari (appellant in Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 435/2019) is
concerned, it will be considered on the next date.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.