JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) HEARD counsel for the parties.
(2.) PETITIONER in this writ application has prayed for issuance of a direction upon the respondents to issue appointment/recruitment/enrolment letter to the petitioner on the post of Constable (G.D.)
against advertisement No. CT(G.D.)/1/03.
The petitioner's case in brief is ยง that in response to the aforementioned advertisement, he had submitted his application. He was called upon to appear at the written examination and admit
card was also issued to him. He appeared at the requisite examinations both written as well as
physical tests and was declared successful by the concerned authorities. The petitioner's
grievance is that in spite of being declared successful at the tests, he has not been granted the
letter of appointment. The further grievance of the petitioner is that at a subsequent examination
conducted by the respondents, the petitioner has submitted his fresh application and in response
to which, he was given a fresh admit card calling him to appear at the examination but later, the
admit card was snatched away from him and he was not allowed to sit at the examination on the
ground that in the earlier examination, he was declared successful.
(3.) A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents explaining therein that though the petitioner had appeared at the written and physical tests and was declared successful at the
examinations but later, as required, he was forwarded for his medical examination by the Medical
Board alongwith several other candidates. The Medical Board did not find the petitioner medically
fit and as such, considering the fact that the petitioner was not found medically fit, he could not
possibly be appointed on the post of constable.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.