HIRAMANI SHUKLA @ HARIBANSH Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND
LAWS(JHAR)-2009-2-77
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on February 18,2009

Hiramani Shukla @ Haribansh Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

JAYA ROY,J. - (1.) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and opposite parties. This revision application has been filed by the first party/opposite party against the order dated 2.4.2007 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, F.T.C. -III, Daltonganj, Palamau in Criminal Revision No. 105 of 2003 setting aside the orders dated 4.7.2003 and the order dated 28.7.2003 passed by the learned Sub -DivIsional Magistrate, Sadar, Daltonganj in Misc. Case No. 297 of 2003 under Sections 145 and 146(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(2.) THE short fact, necessary for the present revision application is that on 4.7.2003 the present petitioner who is first party filed an application before the Sub -Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, Daltonganj for initiation of a proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. over the lands in question against the second party (opposite party). In the said petition at para -2 the petitioner has stated: - "That in amicable arrangement arrived at between his co -sharer, the petitioner has/had been exercising his title and possession over the land fully stated in a separate schedule appended hereinbelow at the foot of this petition and forming a part thereon. The same shall hereinafter be referred to as the land in dispute for the sake of convenience and brevity. Besides the land in dispute, the petitioner has other land also but the same is not essential to be mentioned because the dispute does not relate to those lands." After hearing the first party, the SubDivisional Magistrate initiated a proceeding under Section 145 Cr.P.C. against the both the parties by order dated 4.7.2003. Thereafter on 16.7.03 the first party petitioner again filed a petition under Section 146 Cr.P.C. stating therein that after initiation of this proceeding the second party/opposite party has become much violent and they are making preparation for disposing the first party from the lands in question and they are trying to take the physical possession over the lands in question. Thus this has created a serious situation and if the suitable action be not taken, the bloodshed may occur at the spot. Therefore, they have prayed to attach the subject matter of the proceeding under Section 146 Cr.P.C. and to appoint a receiver to prevent such bloodshed at the spot.
(3.) AFTER hearing the matter, the S.D.M. attached the subject matter (lands in question) and appointed the officer -in -charge of Bishrampur Police Station as receiver and directed him to take possession of the same, by his order dated 28.7.2003 under Section 146 of the Cr.P.C.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.