HARADHAN GOSWAMI Vs. BANK OF INDIA
LAWS(JHAR)-2009-7-55
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on July 24,2009

Haradhan Goswami Appellant
VERSUS
BANK OF INDIA Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD Sri Anil Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri A. Allam, learned senior counsel for the respondents.
(2.) AT the outset, it may be noted that during the pendency of this writ application, the petitioner No. 2 had died. On the prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the name of the petitioner No. 2 has been deleted and this writ application is being pursued by the petitioner No. 1 alone, being the husband of the deceased petitioner No. 2. The petitioners had jointly deposited different amounts of money on different dates in between October, 1983 to August, 1990 by way of Long Term Double Deposit Scheme and each of such deposits were to mature on specified dates. The total amount so deposited by the petitioner was Rs. 1,06,705/ -.
(3.) ON initial maturity of the deposits, the petitioners renewed the sum for the further period and on subsequent maturity, the petitioners demanded payment of the amount but each time they approached the Branch Manager, he deferred the payment of the maturity amount on one pretext or the other.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.