JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the vigilance as also learned counsel for the Jharkhand State Electricity Board and Bihar State Electricity Board.
(2.) THE instant revision application is directed against the order dated 30.1.2006 passed in Special Case No. 30/1989 by the Special Judge, Vigilance, Ranchi, whereby the petition for discharge of
the petitioner filed under Section 239, Cr PC has been rejected.
The instant revision application was filed on 19.8.2006. Thereafter, notices were issued to the opposite parties. The opposite parties have appeared in the case. The petition remained pending
for the last three years, hence, at the stage of admission itself the application has been heard at
length.
(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no allegation against the petitioner in the FIR and during investigation the petitioner's name cropped up and he was added as
party on 27.1.1994. He has submitted that there is no evidence against the petitioner to frame
charges under Sections 409, 420, 465, 467, 471, 120 -B and 201 of the Indian Penal Code and
Section 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. He has further submitted that for the same
offences a departmental proceeding was initiated against the petitioner and the petitioner has
been exonerated in the said departmental proceeding. Petitioner has filed the order passed in the
departmental proceeding as annexed in the petition. He has relied upon the decision reported in
"1999 (9) SCC 1, P.S. Rajya V/s. State of Bihar." The petitioner has also submitted that the order
of sanction is defective since the same has not been passed by the Board. He has annexed the
copy of the Bihar State Electricity Board conduct of business regulations, 1973 to show that only
the board can dismiss the petitioner, executive engineer and as such the sanction must be granted
by the Court. He has thirdly argued that since last so many years the witnesses are not examined
in the case and as such the petitioner's right for speedy trial is being hampered.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.