JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not paid the retirement benefits and, therefore, the present petition has been preferred.
(2.) I have heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, who has submitted that the petitioner's services was terminated on 13th February, 1988 and as he has been
dismissed from service, the petitioner is not entitled for several retirement benefits. Nonetheless,
the petitioner has been paid an amount of Rs. 24,056/ - towards the C.P.F. vide Cheque No.
873678 dated 16th December, 2005. Thereafter, a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No. 1178 of 1998 (R) was preferred by the petitioner, which was disposed of by this Court vide order dated 25th
August, 1999, wherein, also no relief of this type of payment was granted. Thereafter, the present
petitioner instituted Letters Patent Appeal bearing L.P.A. No. 442 of 1999(R), which also dismissed
by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 3rd February, 2000, with a liberty to the
petitioner to approach the respondents and, therefore, it is submitted by the respondents that all
the legally payable amount have already been paid to the petitioner and nothing more is required
to be paid, as stated in the counter affidavit.
Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and circumstances of the present case and also looking to the earlier orders, passed in C.W.J.C. No. 1178 of 1998(R) as
well as in L.P.A. No. 442 of 1999(R) and also looking to the payments, made towards C.P.F., and
also looking to the fact that an amount of Rs. 10.000/ - has been paid to the petitioner towards the
gratuity and also looking to the fact that the petitioner's services have been terminated with
effect from 13th February, 1988 and also looking to the fact that the petitioner could not justify,
under law, any claim, made by him, to entertain this writ petition or to enhance the amount of the
retirement benefits, there is no substance in this writ petition and, hence, the same is hereby
dismissed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.