JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for
the Respondent-State.
(2.) Petitioner, in this writ application, has prayed for a direction upon
the Respondents to consider the petitioner's case for his promotion to the post of
Headmaster and for a further direction to pay him the officiating pay in respect of
the post of Headmaster on which he was made to work from 17.10.1998.
(3.) The admitted facts of the petitioner's case are that he was initially
appointed as an Assistant Teacher in the Government School. Subsequently, on
and from 17.10.1998, when the post of Headmaster fell vacant, he was asked to
take up the post as the In-charge Headmaster of the School. The petitioner was all
along discharging functions of the In-charge Headmaster of the School but he was
not paid the officiating pay for the work, which was discharged by him.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.