JUDGEMENT
M.Y.EQBAL, J. -
(1.) THIS appeal by the appellant -borrower is directed against the judgment and decree dated 7th October, 2005 passed by Subordinate Judge -Vth, Jamshedpur in Money Suit No.70/95, whereby
the aforesaid suit filed by the respondent -Bank in 1995 for recovery of Rs.2.00 lacs has been
decreed.
(2.) THE facts of the case are not in much dispute.
In the year 1988 the defendant -appellant approached the Bank for grant of term loan of Rs. 1,10,000/ - and cash credit facility of Rs.35,000/ - for purchasing machinery, establishing printing press and towards working capital for running the said business. The appellant no.2 agreed to
become guarantor for the aforesaid facilities given to the appellant no.1. The respondent -Bank
agreed to provide the said facilities and allowed the term loan and also the cash credit facilities.
The appellant executed demand promissory notes on 8.10.88 and other documents in order to
secure repayment of the said amount. The case of the plaintiff -Bank is that on 1.10.92 the
appellants acknowledged their liabilities and agreed to pay a sum of Rs.1,33,988.63 against term
loan of Rs.58,646.22 in cash credit accounts. But in spite of demand made by the Bank, the
appellant did not liquidate the dues and ultimately the respondent bank filed the aforementioned
suit.
(3.) FROM perusal of the judgment, it appears that in 2005, when the suit was pending before the court below, the respondent -Bank agreed for a settlement on the basis of one time payment of Rs.
1,05,000/ - but the proposal of the Bank was turned down by the defendant -appellant. In course of argument learned counsel appearing for the parties have not disputed the fact that at the fag end
of the hearing of the suit the aforesaid proposal was made by the Bank and which has not been
accepted by the respondent. The trial court after considering all the documentary evidences
including the promissory note and nature of guarantee both for the term loan and cash credit
facility have come to the conclusion that the plaintiff -Bank is entitled for recovery of a sum of Rs.
2,88,684.85 paise.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.