JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article
226 of the Constitution of India with prayer to produce relevant
record and to pay the amount of overtime with interest in favour of
petitioner as the petitioner has done the overtime duties for which
the amount of overtime has not been paid to the petitioner.
In substance, the petitioner has worked on different
occasions as overtime in between August 1997 to January 2003
and he also spell out the details of the period in which he has done
overtime i.e. 64 hours in 1997, 184 hours in 1998, 48 hours in 1999
and 96 hours in 2000; but the said amount, in spite of several
requests and representations, has not been paid to the petitioner.
Hence this writ petition has been preferred.
(2.) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record. The petitioner, as alleged, that he has made several
representations, oral as well as written, to the respondents and the
respondents have assured him but no payment has been made to
the petitioner.
(3.) In the facts and circumstances of the case, it would be just
and proper to direct the petitioner to file a fresh representation
before the competent authority, particularly respondent No.2 along
with a copy of the order of this court within a period of one month
and the respondents, particularly respondent No.2 will dispose of
the said representation expeditiously, preferably within a period of
four months from the date of submitting the representation with a
copy of the order of this court.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.