JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This petition has been filed under Section 226 of the
Constitution of India by the petitioner for quashing the order dated
16.2.2008 passed by respondent No. 3, the Estate Officer, whereby,
the learned Estate Officer has directed the petitioner to vacate the
quarter, which is without application of mind.
(2.) In the writ petition, it is stated that the petitioner was an
employee of respondent No. 1 and he was having a quarter in licence
in view of his service condition. He has been superannuated from the
service in the year 2001. Thereafter, he applied for the leave and
licence to retain the house but no order was passed by the respondent
authority. The respondent thereafter, opted to seek assistance of
respondent No. 3 to get the house (quarter) vacated under the Public
Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupant) Act, 1971.
(3.) The Estate Officer issued a notice, thereafter the impugned
order of vacation of the house (quarter) was passed.
Learned counsel for the respondent filed a counter affidavit and
it was contended that the order is an appellate order under Section 9 of
the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupant) Act, 1971.
The learned counsel for the respondent refuted the condition and
contended that the order has been passed in utter violation of the
provision of law.
It is not disputed that the respondent No. 3 has no power to pass
an order and the order has been passed by the respondent No. 3 well
without jurisdiction.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.