JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Annexure-5 is a policy decision of the Government issued in
the name of the Governor. Annexure-4, the impugned policy
decision, is also issued in the name of the Governor and has also
been directed to be gazetted like Annexure-5. Annexure-4 carves
out a small exception in the larger policy given out in Annexure-5.
The reasons for carving out this small exception from the larger
policy is also mentioned in Annexure-4, namely that the supply of
water to public is essential, the central Government grant for the
same will lapse unless the exception is carved out, as the
procedure provided in Annexure-5 is time consuming.
(2.) A revision of a policy decision by the Government can be
challenged by an individual citizen only on the following grounds:
(i) that it is barred by the principle of promissory estoppel,
which is not the case here as the petitioner has not acted to his
detriment relying upon Annexure-5.
(ii) the change in policy can also be resisted or challenged
on the ground that the new policy is so arbitrary and unreasonable
as to warrant interference by the Court within the limited sphere
permissible for interference in policy decisions under Article 226 of
the Constitution of India. There does not appear to be any such
arbitrariness involved in Annexure 4. The exception carved out
from the original policy (Annexure 5) is well supported by reasons
which apparently are in public interest also.
(3.) There is no force in the writ petition and accordingly it is
dismissed.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.