JUDGEMENT
PRASHANT KUMAR, J. -
(1.) THE Sole appellant Rabi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar has preferred this appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 7.6.2001 passed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge,
Singhbhum West in Sessions Trial No. 229 of 2000 whereby and whereunder he has been
convicted under section 302 of the IPC and 27 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo
imprisonment for life.
(2.) THE prosecution story as per the written report of P.W. 32 Lakhan Soy is that on 10.4.2000 at about 5.25 p.m. he along with Bijay Singh Soy ( deceased), Sambhu Poddar and Goppi had gone
to Chakradharpur Bazar on an Armada Car bearing Registration No. 6487. At Bata Road,
Chakradharpur, informant, his uncle (deceased) and Gopi got down from the Car and deceased
sent Sambhu Poddar to his house with the aforesaid Car. It is alleged that at that time Lala Pappu
@ Shesh Narayan Lal and Rakesh Ranjan passed on a scooter looking towards them. Soon
thereafter Suresh Sao and Banti Srivastava also passed on a motorcycle looking towards them. It
is further alleged that deceased (Bijay Singh Soy) was sitting inside Subham Vastralaya, whereas
informant and Gopi were standing near Subham Vastralaya. Bijay Singh Soy sent Gopi to
somewhere in connection with some work. At about 6 p.m. Rabi Singh ( appellant), Manoj Singh
came there on a Yahama motorcycle from the side of Pawan Chowk and stopped near Subham
Vastralaya. In the meanwhile Lalji Das and Chhota Manoj Singh @ Binod Singh came from the
side of Shitla Mandir on a Vespa scooter and they too stopped near Subham Vastralaya.
Thereafter the said 4 dreaded criminals got down from their vehicles and started indiscriminate
firing on informant's uncle Bijay Singh Soy with large and sophisticated weapons. The
informant in panic and out of fear entered into a BSC Shoe Shop. Bijay Singh Soy sustained
grievous injuries by indiscriminate firing and fell on the ground. The aforesaid 4 criminals fled away
on their vehicles towards Old Ranchi Road. When the informant thereafter went to Subham
Vastralaya he found his uncle and one unknown person lying dead. His uncle's licensed
pistol, which was with him, was also missing. It is alleged that Lala Pappu @ Shesh Narayan Lal
and Rakesh Ranjan were very close to Lakshman Gilua and due to rivalry the aforesaid three
persons hatched a conspiracy with Arbind Singh, M.L.A. and Munnu Thakur and murdered
informant's uncle. It is also alleged that Lakshman Gilua M.P., Arbind Singh M.L.A. and
Munnu Thakur had threatened his aunts several times.
On the basis of aforesaid written report, police registered Chakradharpur P.S. Case No. 31 of 2000 dated 10.4.2000 against Manoj Singh, Rabi Singh, Lalji Das, Vinod Singh, Lakshman Gilua, M.P, Arbind Singh M.L.A., Munnu Thakur, Lala Pappu @ Shesh Narayan Lal, Rakesh Ranjan,
Suresh Sao and Banti Srivastava under sections 302, 120(B), 379/34 of the IPC and 27 of the
Arms Act and took up investigation. On completing the investigation, police submitted charge
sheet against 8 accused persons, namely, Lakshman Gilua, Lala Pappu @ Shesh Narayan Lal,
Rakesh Ranjan Ambastha, Mithlesh Kumar Thakur, Manoj Singh, Ravi Kumar ( appellant), Suresh
Kumar Sao and Ajay Kumar Srivastava @ Banti. Chhota Manoj @ Vinod Singh and Arbind Singh
@ Malkhan Singh had not been sent up for trial whereas one of the accused Lalji Das was shown
as dead. Cognizance of the offence was taken against the said accused persons whereas
proceeding against accused Arbind Singh and Chhota Manoj @ Vinod Singh and Lalji Das was
dropped. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Chakradharpur committed the case to the court of
sessions as the offence under section 302 of the IPC is exclusively triable by the court of sessions.
After the commitment, the learned court below framed charges against accused persons under
section 120 (B), 149, 302 of the IPC and also under section 27 of the Arms Act. The accused
persons pleaded not guilty and claimed to be tried.
(3.) THE prosecution altogether examined 34 witnesses and also brought documentary evidence in support of its case. From the defence side, the statements of the accused persons were recorded
under section 313 of the Cr.P.C. in which they denied the charges and pleaded not guilty. The
accused persons also examined one witness and brought documentary evidence in support of
their defence.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.