JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) This petition has been filed by the petitioner under
Article 226 of the Constitution of India for direction upon the
respondents to forthwith release the entire arrears of dues which has
been withheld in pursuant to the order of punishment passed by the
State of Bihar vide Circular No. 829 dated 10.9.2001 by which, the
three annual increments have been withheld with cumulative effect,
on the ground that the said order dated 10.9.2001 has already been set
aside by the order dated 11.9.07 passed in WPS No. 1149 of 2006 by
a Bench of this Court as such the petition is entitled to get the entire
arrears of dues which has been withheld in pursuant to the said
Circular since the same is not in existence after being set aside by this
Court.
(2.) In substance, the State of Bihar vide order dated 10.9.01
withheld three increments with cumulative effect as punishment
awarded to the petitioner and the salary during the period of
suspension as the subsistence allowance, was not ordered to be paid.
He further claimed that he is entitled to full payment for the period
when he remained in suspension.
(3.) It is also alleged that the said punishment order was challenged
before this Court in Writ Petition 1149/2006 and the Court on 11.9.07
passed the following order;
"The authority of the Jharkhand Government was only
competent to take a decision after the petitioner was relieved
from Bihar and, therefore, the impugned order dated 10.9.01 is
set aside without going into the merits thereof, and the matter is
remitted to the Secretary, Drinking Water and Sanitation
Department, Govt. of Jharkhand (respondent No. 2). The
Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar, Patna
(respondent No. 4) is directed to send all the records of the
petitioner to the Secretary, Drinking Water and Sanitation
Department, Govt. of Jharkhand (respondent No. 2) within two
weeks form the date of receipt/production of a copy of this
order, if not already sent. The respondent No. 2 will supply a
copy of the enquiry report to the petitioner within two weeks
from the date of receipt of the records to which the petitioner
may file his reply within two weeks, thereafter. The respondent
No. 2 will take a decision in accordance with law within four
weeks from the date of receipt of such reply from the petitioner.
If no such reply is received, the respondent No. 2 will be at
liberty to pass order after considering the enquiry report and the
materials available on the record".;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.