JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) AFFIDAVITS have been exchanged. I have heard both sides at length. The impugned order dated 30.01.2009 has been passed by the Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Jamshedpur under section 7 A of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. A
copy of that order is Annexure -5 to this writ petition. By that order the petitioner has been directed
to pay the computed amount of Rs.1,08,62,124/ -(Rupees one crore eight lacs sixty two thousand
one hundred twenty four only) on account of Provident Fund Pension Fund, Insurance Fund and
Administrative charges. In addition, the petitioner has also been required by the said order to pay
an amount of interest of Rs.76,64,583/ - (Rupees seventy six lacs sixty four thousand five hundred
eighty three only) within 15 days.
(2.) THE case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is engaged in construction industry and in the said industry the petitioner has employed certain long term employees for whom the provisions of
the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 and the Scheme
are being followed regularly. However, the petitioner alleges that there are certain casual workers
who came to work at the construction sites of the petitioner for a day or for a few days and
thereafter move away without leaving any forwarding address.
The petitioner claims that these workmen are not identifiable and it is practically very difficult, in fact almost impossible, to comply with the requirements of the provident fund Scheme in respect of
such migrant labourers.
(3.) FROM the petitioner's side a clarification dated 14.6.1999 has been shown which has been issued exempting casual workers in the construction industry from the Employees' State
Insurance Act, 1948 allegedly on somewhat similar grounds.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.