MANJULA SHARAN SAHAY Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND
LAWS(JHAR)-2009-8-119
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on August 21,2009

Manjula Sharan Sahay Appellant
VERSUS
STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents.
(2.) THE petitioner in this writ petition has prayed for issuance of a direction to the respondents to pay her retiral dues i.e. pension, gratuity, GPF amount as well as difference of salary on account of non - fixation of Central Pay Scale from 1993 to 1994 and also for payment of difference of pay for the period from November 1996 to August, 1999 during which the petitioner was paid only the subsistence allowance on account of her being under suspension and also to pay her other admissible dues together with interest thereon from the date of entitlement till the date of her superannuation. The petitioner retired from service in March, 2002. She had earlier, filed CWJC No. 2694 of 1997R before this Court in which by order dated 16.2.1999 the respondents were directed to conclude the departmental proceedings against the petitioner within six months. The petitioner was also directed to co -operate in the departmental proceedings, failing which the authorities were directed to complete the proceeding ex parte in accordance with law. It was further directed that at the conclusion of six months if the proceeding was not concluded, the order of suspension of the petitioner would stand revoked. However, direction was given to the respondents to pay the petitioner the admitted arrears of salary and the subsistence allowance within two months from the date of the order.
(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner informs that subsequent to the aforesaid order passed in the writ petition, the respondents have paid group insurance and provisional pension as well as arrears of salary to the petitioner. As regards difference of arrears of salary for the period when the petitioner was under suspension, the same has not been paid. Likewise, the amount of gratuity, leave encashment has also not been paid due to the pendency of the criminal proceedings and the departmental proceedings against the petitioner, which has not been concluded and for this reason, final pension of the petitioner has not been fixed.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.