JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) Reserved on 11.09.2018 Pronounced on 18/12/2018
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State.
(2.) This criminal appeal is directed against the Judgment of Conviction dated 29th November, 2006 and Order of sentence dated 30th November,
2006 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Seraikella-Kharsawan in Sessions Trial No. 07 of 2005, whereby the sole appellant was held guilty
and was convicted for offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian
Penal Code and was sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7
(seven) years for offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code.
(3.) Prosecution case, as it appears from the fardbeyan of P.W.2, the victim (recorded on 08.10.2004), is that she resides as a tenant with her
mother, father, elder sister and brother-in-law in the house of Rajesh Gupta.
She stated that on the last night (07.10.2004), after taking meals with her
family members she went to sleep. At about 03.00 a.m. in the wee hours,
she woke up to nature's call and thereafter when she was returning to her
room, when Raju Yadav, who is neighbor, all of a sudden came to her and
pressed her mouth with his hand and by threatening her to kill if she raises
alarm, took her dragging to his room and pushed her on the cot whereafter
he committed rape upon her. Victim tried to raise alarm but the appellant
kept her mouth pressed with his hand. Victim has further stated that
thereafter her brother-in-law Pradeep Tanti came there searching for her
and on seeing her brother-in-law, appellant fled.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.