Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J. - (1.) This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs:- (i) For quashing the office order dated 16.01.2008 (Annexure10) issued by the Chief Manager, Mugma Area (respondent no. 5) whereby he has been pleased to pass a reasoned order as directed by this Court in W.P. (C) No. 2408 of 2007 which was disposed of by Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.N.Tiwari vide order dated 19.09.2007 and while disposing of the said claim of the petitioner, the respondent no. 5 has clearly stated that the claim of the petitioner are not justified and there is no dues which is to be refunded to the petitioner on account of lifting of soft coke/coal. (ii) For a direction upon the respondents to either supply the coal to the tune of 2030 M.T. @ 195.01 per M.T. and in the alternative to refund amount that has been deposited by the petitioner i.e. Rs. 3,96,963.68 P. in the office of respondent No. 5 out of which Rs. 1,32,114.40 has already been paid by the respondent to the petitioner, as such, the balance of Rs. 2,66,849.29P. still pending alongwith interest @ 18% per annum. (iii) For a direction upon the respondents for a suitable compensation in favour of the petitioner as there was lackadaisical attitude of the concerned respondents for which the petitioner has been compelled to move this Court several times and due to which the petitio0enr has to spent huge amount as litigation cost.
(2.) Counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent while passing the impugned order as contained in Annexure-10 dated 16.01.2008 has incorrectly mentioned the rates for lifting of coal. Accordingly, the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 16.01.2008 be quashed and direction be issued to the respondent to release the amount payable to the petitioner as mentioned in the prayer.
(3.) Counsel for the respondents on the other hand submits that aforesaid contention of the petitioner is not admitted and the dues amount which is claimed by the petitioner is disputed by the respondent. Counsel for the respondent further submits that the entire amount has already been paid to the petitioner and nothing is due from the respondents and the impugned order has been rightly passed. Accordingly, this writ petition is not maintainable and fit to be dismissed.;