DR. ANAND KUMAR SINHA Vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND AND ORS.
LAWS(JHAR)-2018-3-126
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on March 22,2018

Dr. Anand Kumar Sinha Appellant
VERSUS
State Of Jharkhand And Ors. Respondents

JUDGEMENT

RAJESH SHANKAR, J. - (1.) The present writ petition has been filed for quashing the notification contained in Reference No. 20/AAYUS Vividh-10/2016-288/20 dated 01.11.2017 (Annexure-11 to the writ petition) by which respondent no. 7 (Baidya Amitabh Kumar) has been declared elected for the State of Jharkhand in the Election for the Member of Central Council of Indian Medicine (hereinafter referred to as "CCIM"), since the election result has been declared before the last date of exercising option to withdraw the name of the candidate intending to contest the election. A further prayer has been made for quashing the entire election process of the Members of CCIM till Jharkhand Rajya AYUSH Chikitsa Parishad prepares a proper voter list of those doctors registered under the Council in accordance with law after reorganisation of the State. The petitioner has further prayed for issuance of direction upon the respondents to prepare a fresh voter list, since the petitioner who is already registered in the CCIM, but his name has not been included in the voter list, though he is presently working in the State of Jharkhand as Ayurvedic Medical Officer. The petitioner has further prayed for issuance of direction upon the respondents to include his name in the voter list.
(2.) The learned counsel for the respondents including the respondent no. 7 raise a preliminary objection with regard to the maintainability of the writ petition and submit that in view of the provisions of Section 4 of the Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 1970") r/w Rule 25 of the Indian Medicine Central Council (Election) Rules, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules, 1975"), the petitioner should have taken recourse of Section 4 of the Act, 1970 and Rule 25 of the Rules, 1975, if at all he was aggrieved by the publication of result declaring the petitioner elected as a member of the CCIM.
(3.) Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the contents of the writ petition as well as the provisions of the Act, 1970 and the Rules, 1975.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.