JUDGEMENT
Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J. -
(1.) Heard Mr. Rajiv Ranjan, learned Senior Counsel on behalf of respondent No. 2 in I: A. No. 9192 of 2017, Mr. Sumit Gadodia, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant in L.P.A. No. 456 of 2017, Mr. Indrajit Sinha, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant in L.P.A. No. 455 of 2017 which is connected with L.P.A. No. 456 of 2017, Mr. V. P. Singh, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent No. 15 and Mr. L. C. N. Sahdeo, learned G.P. IV appearing on behalf of the respondent-State of Jharkhand.
(2.) This application has been preferred by the respondent No. 2 herein (petitioner No. 2 in the writ petition) by which a prayer has been made for recall of the order dated
11.9.2017 whereby and whereunder, the order dated 4.8.2017 passed in W.P.(C) No. 3322 of 2017 by the learned Single Judge has been stayed and certain other conditions have been incorporated in the order dated 11.9.2017 to which the respondent No. 2 is aggrieved.
(3.) The writ petition being W.P.(C) No. 3322 of 2017 was filed by the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (writ petitioner Nos. 12) for quashment of the order dated 16.2017 passed by the Labour Commissioner-cum-Registrar, Trade Union, Government of Jharkhand as contained in Memo No. 2/T2-10-03/17 Shra. No. 1335 dated 16.2017 by which the application submitted by the respondent Nos. 10 to 14 herein was allowed and the objection submitted by the petitioner was rejected. The learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 3322 of 2017 had quashed the order dated 16.2017 and had further given a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur to get the election of the Union conducted afresh within 8 weeks by verifying the voters' list and by calling for the intending candidates for filing their nomination papers and holding the election by secret ballot as well as to declare the result of the election according to law. The present appellants herein (respondent Nos. 1213 in the writ application) have challenged the order of the learned Single Judge in the present appeal. This Court vide order dated 11.9.2017 had granted an interim order of stay in favour of the appellants herein, the relevant portion of which reads as follows:
"We, therefore, stay the operation, implementation and execution of the order passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) No. 3322 of 2017 order dated 4.8.2017, to the extent which it gave a direction to the Deputy Commissioner, Jamshedpur to be appointed as a Special Officer for holding fresh election of the Trade Union. This part of the judgment and order delivered by learned Single Judge is, hereby, stayed.
7. Neither these appellants nor the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 shall be Incharge of the Trade Union Office, nor, they shall operate the following bank accounts of the Trade Union: -
(i) Bank Account No. 3006342017 of Central Bank of India, Telco Branch;
(ii) Bank Account No. 0011564 of Bank of India, Telco Branch; and
(iii) Bank Account No. 587501010050142 of Bank of India, Telco Branch.
8. These bank accounts shall not be operated by these appellants
9. This Letters Patent Appeal is Admitted.
10. Registry is directed to enlist this Letters Patent Appeal along with L.P.A. No.
455 of 2017 under the heading Tor Hearing' in the 2nd week of April, 2018." ;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.