JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the letter No. PO/GDA/FB/9.3.2/2002/1198 dated 12.9.2002, whereby the petitioner s claim for compassionate appointment was rejected. The petitioner has also prayed for a direction on the respondents to provide employment to him on compassionate ground.
(2.) It has been stated that the petitioner is the son of late Jai Deo Mahto, who was working under the respondents as permanent Mazdoor, died in harness on 21.11.1999. The petitioner, thereafter, applied for compassionate appointment within the prescribed time. It has been stated that the petitioner s alias name is Guddu Mahto and the petitioner s father had shown him as Guddu Mahto in the service record. The respondents did not consider the same and by the impugned order, they have rejected the petitioner s claim on the ground that the service record does not show the petitioner as the son of late Jai Deo Mahto and as such, he is not entitled for appointment on compassionate ground. By the impugned order dated 12.9.2002, the petitioner s claim has been arbitrarily rejected on the said ground. It has been stated that not only that the petitioner s name as Guddu Mahto has been mentioned in his father s service record, all the certificates and the relevant records go to show that the petitioner is the son of late Jai Deo Mahto. There is no other claimant for compassionate appointment and there is no reason to doubt the petitioner s claim. The petitioner was, thus, entitled for appointment on compassionate ground under the provisions of 9.3.2 of NCWA-VI. The said letter refusing the petitioner s claim is arbitrary and liable to be quashed.
(3.) Learned Counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents, on the other hand, submitted that the petitioner applied for compassionate appointment in the name of Jai Prakash Mahto. Late Jai Deo Mahto has not shown any such son of Jai Prakash Mahto in the service record. The respondents have to act on the basis of the service record and since the petitioner s name is not mentioned as the son of late Jai Deo Mahto, he is not entitled for appointment on compassionate ground under the provisions of 9.3.2. of NCWA-VI. It has been further submitted that if the petitioner has got alias name Guddu Mahto and if there is any such authentic document in his possession, he should have approached the Director (Personnel), M/s. CCL, Darbhanga;-House, Ranchi or the Project Officer, M/s. CCL. Giddi-A, Hazaribagh, showing the said document, but instead thereof, the petitioner has rushed to this Court.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.