JUDGEMENT
-
(1.) THE petitioner is accused for the offence under Sections 467,
468, 471, 420 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
(2.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel
for the State.
(3.) IT is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner
has been falsely implicated in this case and as a matter of fact, he has
never advance any claim in the property in question even as
descendants of Lalji Mistry and Sk. Nazir Ali. It is further submitted
that the other co-accused persons including Shanker Mistry has been
granted bail by the learned court below and the petitioner who has
no concern whatsoever with the land and neither has he made any
claim over the disputed land, deserves the same privilege. It is lastly
submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 28. 08. 2008.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.