JUDGEMENT
D.G.R.PATNAIK, J. -
(1.) Both these Letters Patent Appeals filed by
the appellant-Food Corporation of India are
directed against a common judgment dated May
19, 2005 passed by a learned single Judge in
C.W.J.C. No. 5857/1997 and C.W.J.C. No.
4497/1997 whereby both the writ petitions filed
by the Management/appellant herein against
the awards of the Industrial Tribunal No. 1 in
favour of the respondent-workmen in
Reference case No. 96/1992 and Reference
Case No. 108/1992 respectively, were
dismissed.
(2.) The case of the workman in C.W.J.C.
No. 5857/1997 relating to Reference Case No.
96/1992, is that he was employed as a casual
typist in the district office of the Food
Corporation of India on September 5, 1986 and
worked there till July 27, 1990. But from July
28, 1990 he was stopped by the Management
from working. He was paid wages up to May
15, 1990 and thereafter no payment was made
to him and on the contrary, his name was struck
off from the Rolls from May 15, 1990. His
assertion was that he had worked for more than
240 days during 12 calendar months and yet
without issuance of notice or payment of
retrenchment compensation as provided under
Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947, he was retrenched from service. The
Management of the Food Corporation of India
contested the claim of the workmen by making
counter assertion that the workman concerned
was an independent professional Typist
working in the Civil Court at Laheria Serai
(Darbhanga) and the Management of the Food
Corporation of India used to get some papers
typed by him occasionally as and when
required. He was not performing any regular
typing work or clerical job nor was he ever
given regular employment under the Food
Corporation of India.
(3.) The dispute was referred to the Tribunal
for adjudication on the following terms of
reference:
"Whether the action of the Management of
Food Corporation of India, Laheria Serai,
Darbhanga, in retrenching Shri Govind
Kumar Choudhary who was working as a
casual typist, arbitrarily and in violation of
Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act,
and denying reinstatement with full back
wage is legal and justified? If not to what
relief the concerned workman is entitled
to?"
The Industrial Tribunal No. 1, Dhanbad,
vide its award passed on December 18, 1996
(read with corrigendum dated February 18,
1997) answered the reference in favour of the
concerned workman and directed the
Management of the Food Corporation of India
to reinstate and regularize the workman from
the date of retrenchment with 50% back wages,
within two months from the date of publication
of the award. Against the award of the Tribunal,
the Management of the Food Corporation of
India filed C.W.J.C. No. 5857/1997.;
Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.