HEERA PRASAD RAMANI Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
LAWS(JHAR)-2008-9-152
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on September 01,2008

HEERA PRASAD RAMANI Appellant
VERSUS
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Respondents

JUDGEMENT

- (1.) Petitioner in this writ application, has prayed for a direction to the Respondents for regularization of his service on the post of Roller Driver in D.R.D.A., Deoghar and also for a direction to pay the minimum scale of pay admissible with allowances etc. with effect from 12.09.2008 in pursuance to the order dated 15.09.2000 (Annexure-4A) passed in C.W.J.C. No. 7888 of 2000 disposed of on 30.08.2000 (Annexure-4) which was passed in C.W.J.C. No. 8085 of 2000 in the case of Arun Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar and Ors. and further prayer to direct the Respondents to pay the arrears of wages, which is due since May, 2006 till date. Heard the parties. Learned Counsel for the petitioner explains that the petitioner has been working since the last 20 years under the Respondents continuously on daily wage basis. The petitioner s post is a sanctioned post. The services of two similarly situated employees were regularized pursuant to an order, passed by this Court earlier in C.W.J.C. No. 9327 of 2000 and they are being paid the minimum wages and allowances as permitted by law. But in spite of repeated representations by the petitioner and despite the fact that the services has been continuously taken by the Respondents even now, the petitioner has neither been regularized in service nor has he been paid the minimum wages admissible under the law.
(2.) Referring to the order passed in W.P. (S) No. 797 of 2008 in the case of Arun Kumar Singh v. State of Jharkhand and Ors., learned Counsel submits that an identical issue was raised in the aforementioned case by some of the similarly aggrieved employees and this Court has directed the Respondents to take appropriate decision regarding regularization of the services of the petitioners therein, in terms of the order passed in C.W.J.C. No. 8085 of 2000 the Patna High Court. Counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Respondents.
(3.) Learned J.C. to G.P. III, representing the Respondent-State of Jharkhand is present and submits that the representation of the petitioner is still in the process of being considered by the Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.