NARESH PRASAD KESHRI Vs. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND AND OTHERS
LAWS(JHAR)-2017-11-149
HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND
Decided on November 06,2017

Naresh Prasad Keshri Appellant
VERSUS
The State of Jharkhand and Others Respondents

JUDGEMENT

S.N.PATHAK,J. - (1.) The petitioner has approached this Court with a prayer for quashing the Office Order No. 8 dated 11.02.2010 (Annexure-5) issued by the Office of the respondent No. 5, whereby and where under the petitioner has been deputed to the post of Accounts Clerk without extending financial benefits of the said post.
(2.) The petitioner was appointed as typist on daily wages under the respondent no. 5 in the year 1980. In the year, 1984, the petitioner was appointed as Choukidar in the work charge Establishment. It is stated that as the petitioner was efficient in typing, he performed the work of typist since 1984 in the said Department/office. On 22.12.1991, the Establishment Committee of the said Department recommended the name of the petitioner for appointment as Typist against the vacant post on the basis of his experience of the said post. Thereafter, no steps were taken by the respondents in the matter of promotion of the petitioner from Class-IV post to Class-III post. As no steps were taken, the petitioner filed a writ petition before this Court vide W.P.(S) No. 1116 of 2007 for direction upon the respondents to promote him to Class-III post for which he is eligible. The said writ application was disposed of vide order dated 17.04.2007 with a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider the claim of the petition and to pass appropriate order in accordance with law. After the direction of this Hon'ble Court, vide Office Order No. 53 dated 30.12.2009 issued by the office of the respondent No. 5, the petitioner was deputed to perform the work of correspondence Clerk, which is a class-III post. Thereafter, the petitioner joined to the post of correspondence clerk as per the order contained in Annexure-3 herein. In reference to Office Order No. 53 dated 30.12.2009, it has been specifically stated in his joining letter itself that he reserved all his legal rights.
(3.) On 11.02.2010 vide Office Order No 8 issued by the respondent No. 5, the petitioner was again deputed to another post i.e. the post of Accounts Clerk, which is also a Class-III post. Though the petitioner is working on Class III post since the year 1991 and also he was appointed to the Class-III post by the order of this Hon'ble Court, till date the petitioner is not being paid the salary of Class-III post neither any compensatory allowances are being paid and as such, the petitioner was compelled to knock the door of this Court.;


Click here to view full judgement.
Copyright © Regent Computronics Pvt.Ltd.